Windows 8 and Server “Next” to Be Developed in Parallel
The transition according to Microsoft for client and server operating systems are … minor…then major…then minor…etc. That is how server and tools unit president Bob Muglia sees it. Basically, Microsoft is sticking to a schedule presented several years ago. It stated that the server and tools unit would put out alternating minor and major versions every two years. The most recent update of the server version of Windows 7, called Windows Server 2008 R2, was a minor update. This update was completed last year.
What will the be the name of the next version of Server 2008? That was not revealed in the interview, but Muglia did point out that Windows Server “vNext” will be a major release of the OS. This is similar to the upgrade of Windows Server 2008 R2 as a minor upgrade to the plain version of Windows Server 2008.
“We’re not talking a lot about the next version of Windows Server today but I think what you’ll see is…that the learnings that we have from Windows Azure will be pulled back into Windows Server, just like there’s features in Windows Server and SQL Server that are being pulled up into Windows Azure and SQL Azure.”
Muglia did say that the next version of Windows Server is progressing in development alongside the next desktop operating system. As of yet, Microsoft is not displaying their cards about a formal codename, or list of features, or even a target date. But according to Muglia, the two teams, one on client and one on server, worked together side by side in the development process.
This goes with the development of the next version of Windows 7, probably to be called Windows 8. Why? Because of Steven Sinofsky.
Steven Sinofsky, whose position is president, of the Windows and Windows Live Division, has made an interesting feature known about how the development process of Windows has changed after he came to the helm of the project. He had been brought in from the Office team.
When Sinofsky was leading Office, Microsoft used product numbers. They did not use code names for future releases of the productivity suite. Office 2010, for example, was Office 14. The next version of Office has already been labeled Office 15.
So when Sinofsky moved over to Windows division, the follow up to Windows Vista became Windows 7, as Vista was Windows 6.0. Thus, it is only natural to assume, and apparently some of Microsoft’s own employees have done so, that the next version of Windows will be labeled Windows 8.
Tip: Click here to run a free scan for common PC errors
loading...









[...] Read more here: Will Windows 8 and Server "Next" to Be Developed in Parallel … [...]
windows is TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO heavy
12 go!!!! when some linux distros are under 500 mo !!
learn to code and then come with a os, not an elephant
Ow come on, to heavy? Computers are still growing to become more powerfull, plenty to handle a new OS. Or else it would be a waste of power don`t you think?
Ow come on, to heavy? Computers are still growing to become more powerfull, plenty to handle a new OS. Or else it would be a waste of power don`t you think?
[...] Read more about: Windows 8 and Server “Next” to Be Developed in Parallel – Windows 8 News [...]
doesnt make sense – yes, the follow up to vista was named “windows 7″ but it _is_ windows version 6.1. win7 is _not_ a major release, just like xp wasnt either.
Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 are both minor releases based upon the same code base, “Windows 7″ was a code name that later became the product name. “7″ never refered to the version.
I am expecting the next windows release to be a major product release with a version number of version 7.0 and the name of the next Server OS to be Windows Server 2012, the Client OS will probably be named Windows 8 on release. I would not be suprised if both releases are 64bit only.
Unfortunately this is only guess work based upon the history of Windows NT since Windows 2000 because thats when the first major development shakeup took place in the Windows department.
hahahahah Windows Vista was Windows Whithorn. So if I think in the way you said, Windows XP was Windows 5 and windows 98 was it Windows 4, windows 95 was Windows 3 and everybody remembers “Dos”.
ha ha ha ha…
Will there be performance session at plugfest this year? I am interested in PGO adoption for Windows 7 and 8 Development, specifically how it was integrated into the overall build process.